In Re Cooper’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Walker v. Packer · Crane v. Tunks · 62 Cal. App. 3d 389 - Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc. · State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Gandy · Republic Insurance Co. v. Davis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he assignment's language does not provide for Cooper to waive or assign any right he had to assert his attorney-client privilege. It does not provide for him to voluntarily disclose or consent to disclosure of any significant part of the matters protected by his attorney-client privilege. Nor does it even provide for Cooper to cooperate as to matters giving rise to his claims against his insurers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hicks“consents to disclosure of any significant part of the [litigation file] unless such disclosure itself is privileged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Re Hicks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.