Franklin v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1975
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bryson v. Bramlett · Day v. Walton · 45 Tenn. App. 172 - McDonald v. Stone · 47 Tenn. App. 136 - Kneeland v. Bruce · 22 Tenn. App. 40 - Mathis v. Campbell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The bill charged a conspiracy on the part of Allen Green, Howard J. Hill, and E. H. Godwin to deprive complainants, and especially Love Franklin, Jr., Catherine Jeffreys and Flossy Jones of their interest in the property at 102 Silverage Ave., Memphis, Tennessee. It is contended that the fraudulent scheme of the conspiracy contemplated its achievement by one or the other of three ways: “1. Actual collection of $3,500 which was grossly and fraudulently inadequate (sic-excessive) for the actual work done; “2. Foreclosure of the trust deed, which is what has actually occurred; “3. Foreclosure when the balloon note became due in 1961, or at refinancing at that time at exorbitant and usurious rates.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.