Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

47 Tex. 452

Lockhart v. Lytle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1877-07-01

Error from Medina. Tried below before the Hon. J. J. Thornton.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1877-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 1940

13 state decisions

7018771880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gould, Associate Justice.

¶1The petition seeks to recover contribution for certain expenditures of money and labor by a partner, for the use of the partnership, without going into a settlement of the partnership accounts; and the authorities are that such a suit cannot be maintained, at least not without showing a special agreement, or a separation of the transaction from partnership accounts. (Collyer on Partnership, sec. 284; Parsons on Partnership, 286; 1 Story’s Eq., sec. 664.)

¶2Further, if the petition be held to state a cause of action, it shows an indebtedness accruing more than two years before suit brought, and the exception setting up the defense of limitation was properly sustained.

¶3The averments of the petition do not show a partnership *454actually continued until within two years of the commencement of suit, but, on the contrary, it is the legitimate inference from those averments, that the partnership was dissolved more than two years before suit.

¶4Thé judgment is affirmed.

¶5Affirmed.

/47/tex/452 · .json · Public domain