47 Tex. Crim. 371 - Hendrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““This character of practice should not be tolerated by the court; and it may not be necessary, as the case will be reversed on other grounds, to decide whether or not appellant has placed himself in the attitude for reversal upon this ground, because no application for continuance was made at this point. Matters of this sort have been condemned by the appellate courts of this state. March v. State, 44 Tex. 64 ; Eldridge v. State, 12 Tex. App. 208; Lindley v. State, 11 Tex. App. 283.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 105 Tex. Crim. 436 - Hilley v. State