Farnsworth v. Hatch’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2014
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Bauquier · Thomas v. Hosselkus · Putney v. Fletcher · Clark v. Patterson · Brundage v. Union Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`One whose personal interests are in conflict with his duty as administrator is not a proper person to hold the office'.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Adkin's Estate“[A] person may not be disqualified merely because he claims property which is also claimed by the estate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“He who has two masters to serve must lie to one of them,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.