47 Va. App. 616 - Young v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · LeVasseur v. Commonwealth · Kirkpatrick v. Commonwealth · 7 Va. App. 10 - Blain v. Commonwealth · 1 Va. App. 241 - Sutphin v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“set aside or found invalid solely due to an error in the [original] sentencing proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Young v. Com.“[t]o remand for a new trial would be a futile act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Young v. Com.“impanel a different jury to ascertain punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Young v. Com.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.