Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Va. App. 754 - Deville v. Commonwealth

47 Va. App. 754 - Deville v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2021

16 state decisions

100200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · 41 Va. App. 250 - Kelly v. Commonwealth · Correll v. Commonwealth · Muhammad v. Com.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`would have altered the outcome of the case.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A] trial judge’s denial of a Brady motion to vacate a conviction—if predicated on an unequivocal finding of no prejudice in a bench trial—produces a result conceptually no different from that which would follow the granting of the motion, a reopening of the evidentiary record for the new evidence to be admitted, and a reinstatement of the earlier conviction order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[p]rejudice cannot be shown where, as here, the trial judge was the trier of fact and, upon learning of the undisclosed information, rules unequivocally that the impeachment evidence would have had no impact on the factfinding underlying the defendant's conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.