Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Wash. App. 232 - State v. Randle

47 Wash. App. 232 - State v. Randle’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably 111 Wash. 2d 353 - In Re the Personal Restraint of Williams (1988), State v. Varga (2004)

40 state decisions

260198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Weaver v. Graham · Porzig v. Nolden · Lindsey v. State of Washington · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “that the use of juvenile offenses to determine or enhance sentences for subsequent adult crimes constitutes additional punishment for the prior conduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A law is retrospective if it `changes the legal consequences of acts completed before its effective date.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the State does not have the affirmative burden of proving the constitutional validity of a prior conviction before it can be used in a sentencing proceeding. However, a prior conviction which has been previously determined to have been unconstitutionally obtained or which is constitutionally invalid on its face may not be considered. Constitutionally invalid on its face means a conviction which without further elaboration evidences infirmities of a constitutional magnitude.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.