47 Wash. App. 648 - State v. Tyler’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2009
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 42 Wash. 2d 799 - State v. Emmanuel · 101 Wash. 2d 355 - State v. Allen · 94 Wash. 2d 721 - State v. Sass · 27 Wash. App. 498 - State v. Davis · 23 Wash. App. 226 - State v. Pawling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if originally no request was made when the questions were submitted to the court by the jury, due process and a fair trial would require the court, sua sponte, to resolve the jury's confusion. The error could not be held harmless.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Marohl · State v. Marohl“in the jury instructions. The jury was instructed that the defendant's act or omission must have been done with intent to deprive or defraud the State. The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.