47 Wash. App. 781 - Raymond v. Ingram’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 district · 34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably DeRose v. Carswell (1987), CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop (1999)
2 district · 34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 107 Wash. 2d 72 - Tyson v. Tyson · 97 Wash. 2d 880 - Glass v. Stahl Specialty Company · 43 Wash. App. 230 - Steele v. Organon, Inc. · 31 Wash. 2d 605 - Markley v. Markley · 83 Wash. 2d 630 - Ashley v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) The inconsistent position first asserted must have been successfully maintained; (2) a judgment must have been rendered; (3) the positions must be clearly inconsistent; (4) the parties and questions must be the same; (5) the party claiming estoppel must have been misled and have changed his position; (6) it must appear unjust to one party to permit the other to change.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“it is not necessary to know the total extent of damages that an act causes to begin the running of the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ew v. Dch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.