Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 47 Wis. 2d 810 - Gibson v. State

47 Wis. 2d 810 - Gibson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
6
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably 76 Wis. 2d 286 - In INTEREST OF DH v. State (1977), 51 Wis. 2d 231 - Edwards v. State (1971)

42 state decisions

18019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Gault · Kent v. United States · State v. Reppin · 43 Wis. 2d 661 - Ernst v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Children’s Code (ch. 48, Stats.) provides that ‘exclusive jurisdiction’ is vested in the juvenile court over any child who is alleged to be delinquent because he has ‘violated any state law’ (sec. 48.12(1), Stats.). ‘Child’ is defined as a person under eighteen (sec. 48.02(3)). Only if juvenile jurisdiction is waived as provided in sec. 48.18 can a child charged with a crime against the state be prosecuted in an adult criminal court.’’ (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Courts have the right to assume in such a situation that counsel has fulfilled his duty of proper representation by fully explaining to the accused the nature of the offense charged, the range of penalties, and possible defenses thereto, and satisfying himself that the accused understands such explanations, before permitting the accused to authorize the entry of a plea of guilty.” Strickland, supra, page 631.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “jurisdiction with respect to charges of delinquency that are actually before it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.