State v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1900
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 1930
1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Totten v. Nighbert · 39 W. Va. 432 - Stockton v. Morris · Kester v. Lyon · Hyman, Moses & Co. v. Smith · Boggs' Admr. v. Johnson's Admr.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While it is law that he may redeem these lands, and eject the. claimants, ■yet the law does not permit him.to do so; nor is it just to the state that he should until he satisfies the unpaid taxes due thereon. The inchoate title of these claimants until the payment of the arrearage taxes is superior to the forfeited title, and may become absolute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hellems v. Roszel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.