In Re Stanton’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2014
2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matter of Haupt · Matter of Russell · Matter of Fogel · Matter of Haupt · Matter of Whitlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“respondent failed to file a bond review motion when requested to do so by his client; failed to communicate in any significant fashion with his client; failed to investigate the facts of his client's case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Rosen · In re Stanton“[Petitioner] refused in open court to take any affirmative action to further his client’s desires in this matter.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Rosen · In re Stanton“arrogant and abusive manner towards his clients”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter of Rosen · In re Stanton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.