United States v. Canieso’s Empirical Analysis
470 F.2d 1224 · 1972
Citation profile
90 federal appellate · 7 district · 29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 152 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably United States v. Ordonez (1983), United States v. Hensel (1983)
90 federal appellate · 7 district · 29 state decisions — followed in 17 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Aguilar v. Texas · Chimel v. California · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 152 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'probative indications of criminal activity . . .'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]t is settled law that the validity of an arrest or search can be supported by evidence which was adduced at trial even though [it] was not presented at the pretrial suppression hearing,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘[I]n a large metropolitan police establishment the collective knowledge of the organization as a whole can be imputed to an individual officer when he is requested or authorized by superiors or associates to make an arrest.’ Williams v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 308 F.2d 326, 327 (1962); see United States v. Bianco, 189 F.2d 716 (3 Cir. 1951); Smith v. United States, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 358 F.2d 833 (1966) (Burger, J.), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 1008 , 87 S.Ct. 1350 , 18 L.Ed.2d 448 (1967); United States v. Pitt, 382 F.2d 322 (4 Cir. 1967).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.