Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 F.2d 285 - United States v. Brown

United States v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

470 F.2d 285 · 1972

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Farrow v. United States (1978), United States v. Robin (1977)

56 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

57019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 849 (§ 409 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on Santobello v. New York · Gillette v. United States · Marietta Norton v. The Discipline Committee of East Tennessee State University · Lego v. Twomey · Verdugo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure were amended in 1966 to provide ... that the sentencing court "may disclose" the pre-sentence report, it certainly was intended that the sentencing court exercise its discretion in each case. It is equally clear that when a judge states, as he did here, that in effect his policy is never to disclose presentence reports, that is not an exercise of discretion on an individual basis. Discretion under [then-]Rule 32(c)(2) must be exercised on a case-by-case basis, not by a blanket policy of non-disclosure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.