Thomas F. Donofrio v. William B. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
470 F.2d 428 · 1972
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2009 · most notably Mid-West Paper Products Company 78-1736 v. Continental Group Inc Shopping Cart Inc 78-1746 (1979), Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,301 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spence & Green Chemical Company and Andrew Spence, Sr. (1980)
7 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1 · 28 U.S.C. § 292
Relies on Barr v. Matteo · Carter v. Stanton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“good reasons for [the movant's] complete inability to produce the evidence necessary to defeat the motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shows the necessary facts exist but for some good reason he is unable to produce them on the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.