Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 F.2d 469 - United States v. Cary

United States v. Cary’s Empirical Analysis

470 F.2d 469 · 1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
May 1998
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 1998

12 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

140197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Borum v. United States · United States v. Holt · William Franklin v. United States of America, Norman G. Price v. United States of America, Joseph J. Brooks v. United States · Hiet v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “.• . But whether evidence concerning fingerprints, standing alone, is sufficient to sustain a conviction will depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case. . . . The decision will often turn on the extent to which the fingerprinted object was accessible to the defendant. For instance, do the circumstances negate the possibility that the defendant may have touched the object at some other time? .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.