Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 F.2d 820 - American Republic Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, American Republic Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a Corporation

American Republic Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, American Republic Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company, a Corporation’s Empirical Analysis

470 F.2d 820 · 1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
8
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2010

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 10 state decisions

11019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co. · Duane Jones Co. v. Burke · Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. Glen · National Rejectors, Inc. v. Trieman · E. W. Bliss Co. v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Union could not remain silent and accept benefits derived from the activities of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Union was, or should have been, aware that [these activities] were going on,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.