Jones’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
19 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably 753 F. Supp. 2d 611 - Liberty University, Inc. v. Geithner (2010), Sarasota Wine Market, LLC v. Eric Schmitt (2021)
19 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States · Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore. · Clinton v. City of New York · C & a Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]o establish standing, a plaintiff is required to show that he or she had ‘suffered an injury in fact, meaning that the injury is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.’ Second, the injury must be traceable to the defendant’s challenged action. Third, it must be ‘likely’ rather than ‘speculative’ that a favorable decision will redress the injury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has a direct negative effect on their borrowing power, financial strength, and fiscal planning.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“law `overtly discriminates' against interstate commerce if it is discriminatory on its face, if it has a discriminatory purpose, or if it has a discriminatory effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.