Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 F.3d 1271 - United States v. Walker

United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

470 F.3d 1271 · 2006

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

30 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably United States v. Moran (2007), United States v. Oaks (2010)

30 federal appellate ·

310200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on United States v. McCarthy · United States v. Chesney · United States v. Shoffner · United States v. Hernandez-Guevara · United States v. Engleman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) relevant to a material issue; (2) similar in kind and not overly remote in time to the crime charged; (3) supported by sufficient evidence; and (4) higher in probative value than prejudicial effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To determine if a crime is too remote in time to be admissible under Rule 404(b), we apply a reasonableness standard, evaluating the facts and circumstances of each case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only when the evidence clearly had no bearing on the case and was introduced solely to prove the defendant's propensity to commit criminal acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.