Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 Mich. 56 - People v. Moore

People v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2023

2 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

120200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lorillard v. Pons · Dunn v. United States · Hohn v. United States · United States v. Granderson · People v. Francis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the crime charged was committed by the defendant or some other person; (2) the defendant performed acts or gave encouragement that assisted the commission of the crime; and (3) the defendant intended the commission of the crime or had knowledge that the principal intended its commission at the time that [the defendant] gave aid and encouragement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he phrase `aids and abets' is used to describe any type of assistance given to the perpetrator of the crime by words or deeds that are intended to encourage, support, or incite the commission of that crime.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Harris drove Eugene Mays to a gasoline station. Mays had a sawed-off shotgun in the vehicle. Harris first entered the store on the pretense of asking for directions. After leaving the store, he reentered moments later followed by Mays, who was wielding the shotgun. While Mays pointed the gun at the clerk, Harris approached a customer from behind and proceeded to remove the customer’s wallet and other items from his pockets. The clerk refused to give Mays any money and pushed a button that locked the cash register. Although Harris repeatedly directed Mays to “pop,” or shoot, the clerk after he locked the register, the two men left the store without physically harming either the clerk or the customer. Defendant Harris was convicted by a jury on two counts of armed robbery, two counts of felony-firearm on an aiding and abetting theory, and one count of fleeing and eluding the police.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.