Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 Mich. 593 - Grossman v. Brown

Grossman v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McDougall v. Schanz · Tryc v Michigan Veterans’ Facility · In Re MCI Telecommunications Complaint · Ameritech Michigan v. Public Service Commission · Gardin v. Long Beach Mortgage Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Legislature's rationale for this disparity is, without doubt, traceable to the fact that until a civil action is underway, no discovery is available. See MCR 2.302(A)(1). Thus, the Legislature apparently chose to recognize that at the first stage, in which the lawsuit is about to be filed, the plaintiff's attorney only has available publicly accessible resources to determine the defendant's board certifications and specialization. At this stage, the plaintiff's attorney need only have a reasonable belief that the expert satisfies the requirements of MCL 600.2169. See MCL 600.2912d(1). However, by the time the plaintiff's expert witness testifies at trial, the plaintiff's attorney has had the benefit of discovery to better ascertain the qualifications of the defendant's physician, and, thus, the plaintiff's attorney's reasonable belief regarding the requirements of MCL 600.2169 does not control whether the expert may testify.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “our Supreme Court noted the need for a plaintiff in a medical malpractice action to obtain a medical expert at two different stages of the litigation, i.e., at the time the complaint is filed and at the time of trial, [and] recognized the differing features of [ MCL 600.2912d(1) (governing affidavits of merit) ] and [ MCL 600.2169 (governing testimony at trial) ]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.