Martin v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. City of Louisville · Pulliam v. State · German v. State · Neeley v. State · Ritchie v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'No one has ever challenged the fact that Martin was convicted of a crime with which he was not charged. The fact that his issue was not raised at the trial level, the post-conviction hearing or in this appeal does not permit us to ignore such fundamental error at the appellate level'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State · Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.