Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 NW2D 15 - State v. Green

State v. Green’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Wiederien (2006), Holiday Inns Franchising, Inc. v. Branstad (1995)

23 state decisions

130199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 110 Wash. 2d 728 - State v. Barefield · State v. Schlemme · Probasco v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission · Casteel v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division · State v. Richards

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the language of the statute; (2) the objects sought to be accomplished; (3) the evils sought to be remedied; and (4) a reasonable construction that will effectuate the statute’s purpose rather than one that will defeat it.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person who has been requested to submit to a chemical test shall be advised by a peace officer of the following: 1. If the person refuses to submit to the test, the person’s driver’s license ... will be revoked by the department as required by and for the applicable period specified under section 321J.9. 2. If the person submits to the test and the results indicate the presence of a controlled substance or other drug, or an alcohol concentration equal to or in excess of the level prohibited by section 321J.2 or 321J.2A, the person’s driver’s license ... will be revoked by the department as required by and for the applicable period specified under section 321J.12.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.