Brooks v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 1994
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sharp v. Sharp · Saint-Pierre v. Saint-Pierre · Nelson v. Nelson · Johnson v. Johnson · Studt v. Studt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the trial court should consider the length of the marriage; the respective earning capacity of the parties; their respective financial condition after the property division; their respective age, health and physical condition; their station in life or social standing; and the relative fault in the termination of the marriage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bell v. Bell“For a combined net income above the schedule in § 25-7-6.2, the child support obligation shall be established at an appropriate level, taking into account the actual needs and standard of living of the child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Earley v. Earley“This Court will not disturb an award of child support unless it clearly appears the trial court abused its discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Earley v. Earley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.