Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 470 Pa. 401 - Commonwealth v. Lee

Commonwealth v. Lee’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

35 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Linkletter v. Walker · Desist v. United States · Williams v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We recognize that various inequities arise in all three standards [which determine the effective date of a decision] when one litigant benefits from a decision and another, seemingly similarly situated, is denied the same benefit. We are of the opinion that the Little-Linkletter finality approach, which was first announced in United States v. Schooner Peggy, 1 Cranch 103 , [ 5 U.S. 103 ], 2 L.Ed. 49 (1801), should remain as the standard for issues of applicability in this Commonwealth. 6”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.