470 So. 2d 105 - Prangler v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2009
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 469 So. 2d 868 - Valdes v. State · 422 So. 2d 1029 - Curry v. Wainwright · 308 So. 2d 134 - Epler v. JUDGES OF THIRTEENTH JC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] trial court has no authority to prevent gain time. See Valdes v. State, 469 So.2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Consequently, any waiver of gain time by the defendant was ineffective and the portion of the trial court order referring to gain time was surplusage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.