United States v. Jennings’s Empirical Analysis
471 F.2d 1310 · 1973
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably United States v. Robinson (1977), United States v. Diggs (1975)
29 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1955 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Allen v. United States · Cruz v. Hauck · Gotthelf v. Commissioner · United States v. District Court · Parham v. Cortese
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[A] closer reading makes clear that the court was concerned with the necessity for charging knowledge or notice of the existence of the injunction, as distinguished from its federal character.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.