Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 F.2d 381 - Stringer v. United States

Stringer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

471 F.2d 381 · 1973

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2006 · most notably Cell Associates, Inc. v. National Institutes of Health (1978), Fountain v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority (1982)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1201973198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 460 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on United States v. Dow · Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kan Ry Co · Hurley v. Kincaid · Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. United States · Campbell v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question on which issue is joined is whether the government may exercise its eminent domain power consistently with the Fifth Amendment by physically seizing property without any prior notice, hearing, or compensation. The answer to this question is yes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.