Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 F.3d 158 - Colbert v. Potter

Colbert v. Potter’s Empirical Analysis

471 F.3d 158 · 2006

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
December 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 47 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Singleton v. Wulff · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a nonmoving party could not have produced any 'evidence sufficient to create a substantial question of fact material to the governing issues of the case'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[L]ike a statute of limitations, [the statutory time requirement] is subject to waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.