United States v. Daidone’s Empirical Analysis
471 F.3d 371 · 2006
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2022
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 892 · 18 U.S.C. § 894
Relies on United States v. Booker · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · United States v. Crosby · United States v. Indelicato · United States v. Grammatikos
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reich v. Lopez · Reich v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.