United States v. Hook’s Empirical Analysis
471 F.3d 766 · 2006
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Argyropoulos v. City of Alton (2008), Kaemmerling v. Lappin (2008)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Schmerber v. State of California · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · Mistretta v. United States · New Jersey v. T. L. O.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In the event that [a defendant] had committed other crimes for which he might be convicted as a result of his DNA being collected, any punishment that he would receive would be in relation to a new conviction, not his original conviction, and thereby would not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“the DNA [statute] does not operate retroactively to punish [the defendant] for his original crime, but rather any punishment that would ensue would be the result of new conduct, i.e., [the defendant's] failure to comply with the DNA [statute]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Banks“We repeatedly have made clear that perfunctory and undeveloped argument, and arguments that are not supported by pertinent authority, are waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.