Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 F.3d 792 - United States v. Whiting

United States v. Whiting’s Empirical Analysis

471 F.3d 792 · 2006

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2023

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

100200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co Harris Trust and Savings Bank Sperry Master Retirement Trust No · United States v. Robinson · Luna Aj v. B · United States v. Curry · United States v. Bothun

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “include amounts ... that a participant or beneficiary pays to an employer, or amounts that a participant has withheld from his wages by an employer, for contribution to the plan as of the earliest date on which such contributions can reasonably be segregated from the employer’s general assets.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the district court improperly applied the loss causation standard by finding both no causation and causation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.