Jemison v. Deboo

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 25, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-04-25

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2012-04-25

PER CURIAM:

¶1Dennis Elijah Jemison appeals the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jemison v. Deboo, No. 1:11-cv-00047-JES (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

¶3 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).