Coles v. Harvey’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“after a more complete factual record has been developed through discovery”); Miles v. Univ. of D.C., No. 12-cv-378, 2013 WL 5817657 , at (D.D.C. Oct. 30, 2013) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[d]efendant's factual assertions do not establish the contrary as a matter of law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“sufficiently pled that she was a joint employee”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.