471 So. 2d 121 - Allah v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Hale · Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley · Ruffalo v. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n · Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To permit the state to benefit from the fruits of its own deceptions violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment and article I, section 9, of the Florida Constitution. See Doyle v. Ohio, [ 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct. 2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)]; see also United States v. Hale, 422 U.S. 171, 182 , 95 S.Ct. 2133, 2139 , 45 L.Ed.2d 99 , [108] (White, J., Concurring).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.