Boatwright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1986
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ex Parte Smith · 392 So. 2d 1266 - McKinnis v. State · 392 So. 2d 1270 - Jones v. State · 374 So. 2d 406 - Causey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal of his conviction for trafficking in marijuana; (2) that his trial counsel had a conflict of interest and (3) that he did not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to trial by jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Boatwright cannot blame his conviction on the alleged incompetence of his attorneys. His own statements convicted him...."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we cannot imagine anything defense counsel could have done to change the result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.