Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 So. 2d 1282 - State v. Brumley

471 So. 2d 1282 - State v. Brumley’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 462 So. 2d 455 - State v. Snow · Brumley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether, by operation of the contemporaneous objection rule, a defendant is precluded from challenging, on direct appeal, the trial court's retention of jurisdiction over one-half of his sentence when no objection to such retention is made at the time of sentencing?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that where the trial court fails to follow the mandatory requirements of the sentencing statute, a defendant may not be precluded from raising this point on appeal because he failed to object in the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.