¶1Affirmed. King v. State, 436 So.2d 50 (Fla.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1690, 80 L.Ed.2d 163 (1984); Sireci v. State, 399 So.2d 964 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 984, 102 S.Ct. 2257, 72 L.Ed.2d 862, reh’g denied, 458 U.S. 1116, 102 S.Ct. 3500, 73 L.Ed.2d 1378 (1982); Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 847, 80 S.Ct. 102, 4 L.Ed.2d 86 (1959); Adan v. State, 453 So.2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Clark v. State, 378 So.2d 1315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
471 So. 2d 1301
Hines v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 11, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-06-11
Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · Tamotsu Tanaka v. Creditors' Committee 1
Decided 1985-06-11