471 So. 2d 1349 - Dailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

cited by 20 later decisions

states following

October 1996

most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 448 So. 2d 1013 - State v. Rhoden · 462 So. 2d 450 - Kronz v. State · 462 So. 2d 452 - Walker v. State · 463 So. 2d 398 - Davis v. State · 390 So. 2d 448 - Sandstrom v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“"Sentencing errors may be reviewed on appeal, even in the absence of a contemporaneous objection, if the errors are apparent from the four corners of the record."”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 682 So. 2d 1085 - State v. Montague · 676 So. 2d 7 - Norman v. State
“(1) A sentence of imprisonment shall not begin to run before the date it is imposed, but the court imposing a sentence shall allow a defendant credit for all of the time he spent in the county jail before sentence. The credit must be for a specified period of time and shall be provided for in the sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 624 So. 2d 744 - Kio v. State
“DOES THE CONTEMPORANEOUS OBJECTION RULE APPLY TO PRECLUDE APPELLATE REVIEW OF AN ALLEGED SENTENCING ERROR UNDER THE GUIDELINES WHERE THE ERROR CLAIMED INVOLVES FACTUAL MATTERS THAT ARE NOT APPARENT OR DETERMINABLE FROM THE RECORD ON APPEAL?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 488 So. 2d 532 - Dailey v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.