¶1Affirmed. We have considered each of the issues raised by appellant and find no reversible error. In particular, we find no error in the trial court’s withholding of adjudication and sentence on Count II since the offense charged in Count II was a lesser included offense of Count I and appellant could not properly be adjudicated and sentenced under both counts. See Bell v. State, 437 So.2d 1057 (Fla.1983). We construe the court’s order withholding adjudication as simply giving effect to this rule.
471 So. 2d 1377
471 So.2d 1377
10 Fla.L.Weekly 1684
Walsh v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 10, 1985
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-07-10
Relies on 437 So. 2d 1057 - Bell v. State
Decided 1985-07-10