Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 SO2D 437 - Shires v. Shires

Shires v. Shires’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 2014

3 state decisions

101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education · Bankers Mortgage Co. v. United States · 347 So. 2d 985 - Pierson v. Pierson · 383 So. 2d 847 - Denton v. Sanford · 366 So. 2d 293 - McSween v. McSween

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In equity a party has no right to a jury trial to determine whether he is entitled to relief unless such is provided for by statute or otherwise. Shelton v. Shelton , 376 So.2d 740 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). Neither the Alabama Constitution, the Alabama Code, nor the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure provide for a jury trial in this matter. Thus, we conclude that husband's contentions are without merit."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.