Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

471 So. 2d 716

Docket No. 83-KA-1395.

State v. Chapman

STATE of Louisiana v. Steve CHAPMAN.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 20, 1985.

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1985-06-20

Relies on State v. Vessel · Fisher v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · State v. London

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-06-20

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light (2007), 869 So. 2d 114 - Ramey v. DeCaire (2004)

55 state decisions

2001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Mike McMahon, Nick Noreia, Asst. Dist. Attys., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶2Dwight Doskey, New Orleans, Orleans Indigent Defender Program, for defendant-appellant.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The defendant, Steve Chapman, was tried by a jury and convicted of indecent behavior with a juvenile in violation of R.S. 14:81. After a hearing conducted in May of 1977, he was adjudicated a fourth offender for purposes of R.S. 15:529.1 and sentenced to twenty years at hard labor. In January of 1978, this Court then granted defendant's application for remedial writs, vacated and set aside his sentence, and remanded the case to the trial court for purposes of appointing a sanity commission "with reference to relator's mental capacity to proceed." State v. Chapman,353 So.2d 1338, 1339 (La.1978). The trial court complied with that order, and after conducting a hearing on the commission's report in May of 1978, found that the defendant was "presently sane." The minutes for that proceeding indicate that the trial court then informed defendant of his right to appeal but did not resentence him. Therefore, defendant is not presently under sentence for his conviction.

¶5It is settled that "... a defendant can appeal from a final judgment of conviction only where sentence has been imposed." State v. London,316 So.2d 743 (La.1975); State v. Moore,260 La. 299, 256 So.2d 96 (La.1971); La.C.Cr.P. art. 912. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and this case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing in conformity with law.

¶6APPEAL DISMISSED: CASE REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

/471/so2d/716 · .json · Public domain