Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 SW2D 404 - Ex Parte Tate

Ex Parte Tate’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2017

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

4019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Illinois · Tate v. Short · John Rooney v. State of North Dakota · 158 Tex. Crim. 313 - Hill v. State · Donald v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““... A law which changes the punishment for a crime after the crime has been committed is an ex post factor law as prohibited by Tex.Const., Art. I, Sec. 16, Vernon’s Ann.St. and U.S. Const., Art. I, Sec. 10, ...” Ex parte Tate, 471 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.Cr.App.1971).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We emphasize that our holding today does not suggest any constitutional infirmity in imprisonment of a defendant with the means to pay a fine who refuses or neglects to do so. Nor is our decision to be understood as precluding imprisonment as an enforcement method when alternative means are unsuccessful de spite the defendant’s reasonable efforts to satisfy the fines by those means; the determination of the constitutionality of imprisonment in that circumstance must await the presentation of a concrete case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.