Broussard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1998
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powers v. Hauck · Smith v. State · Pittman v. State · David v. State · Siros v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In cases where the record of any portion thereof is lost or destroyed it may he substituted in the trial court and when so substituted the record may be prepared and transmitted to the Court of Criminal Appeals as in other cases.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State · Glover v. State“[u]nder 44.11, the trial court may make substitutions for lost or destroyed documents, and under 40.09, Sec. 7, his findings, if supported by evidence at the hearing, are final.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State“an indictment nor a legally substituted copy of the indictment....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harris v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.