Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 SW2D 831 - Mistrot v. State

Mistrot v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
June 2004
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2004

18 state decisions

1501971198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. State · 168 Tex. Crim. 306 - Rogers v. State · 169 Tex. Crim. 239 - Rogers v. State · 170 Tex. Crim. 617 - Sutton v. State · Sensabaugh v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The Court of Criminal Appeals rarely reverses a conviction of crime solely because an improper question was propounded to the defendant as a witness. To cause reversal the question must be obviously harmful to the defendant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.