Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 SW2D 841 - Pete v. State

Pete v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1998

8 state decisions

50197119801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Henry v. Mississippi · National Labor Relations Board v. Garwin Corp. · United States v. Hayes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You have the right to employ or retain a lawyer to represent you. “You have the right to remain silent, the right to have a lawyer present during any interview with peace officers or lawyers representing the State, the right to terminate the interview at any time, and the right to request the appointment of a lawyer if you are indigent and cannot afford a lawyer. “You have the right to have an examining trial. “You are not required to make a statement, and any statement made by you may be used against you.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Knoppa v. State
  2. ““The fact that appellant did not specifically say that he waived counsel before signing the confession does not prevent the trial court from concluding that appellant knowingly and intelligently waived counsel. Waiver is to be determined from the totality of the circumstances.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Knoppa v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.