Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 471 SW2D 848 - Terry v. State

Terry v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2010 · most notably American Plant Food Corporation v. State (1974), Bynum v. State (1989)

39 state decisions

20019711980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Becher v. United States · 159 Tex. Crim. 535 - Redding v. State · Schepps v. State · 123 Tex. Crim. 209 - Baker v. State · Neville v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... The indictment must allege on its face the facts necessary (1) to show that the offense was committed, (2) to bar a subsequent prosecution for the same offense, and (3) to give the defendant notice of precisely what he is charged with. . .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The certainty required in an indictment is such as will enable the accused to plead the judgment that may be given upon it in bar of any prosecution for the same offense.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Not only is there no definition of such a stamp present, there is no description of the stamp in question. There is nothing in this indictment to inform the accused of the specific acts he is alleged to have committed to commit this offense. It is only by speculation and by looking outside the indictment that the accused can determine the acts with which he is charged. ****** In the instant indictment there are no explanatory averments of any type or being and therefore insufficient pleadings are presented.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.