Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

471 S.W.3d 405

State v. Fulk

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 2015

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2015-10-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 2016

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM

¶2Gary Fulk (“Defendant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment following a jury trial convicting him of production of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.211, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013; possession of a controlled substance, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo Cum. Supp. 2013; and possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, in violation of Section 195.233, RSMo (2000). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/471/sw3d/405 · .json · Public domain