In re Lee’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 103 · 11 U.S.C. § 1501 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1507 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1508 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1515 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1520 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1521 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1522 (§ 801 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005)
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development Commission · Maggio v. Zeitz · Oriel v. Russell · International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.